"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
09/01/2016 at 16:03 • Filed to: None | 3 | 2 |
Another bigger thing.
jimz
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/01/2016 at 16:04 | 2 |
1960 I believe.
edit: nope, ‘63.
JeepJeremy
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/01/2016 at 17:02 | 1 |
Wow! That's a beautiful car!!